The way people express their opinions is intriguing. When they like something, they tend to provide a detailed explanation for their preference, trying to convince others. But when they dislike something, they often start with a complaint, followed by personal criticism and then justify their negative opinion, even if it lacks substance such as calling this bloat when god knows that is not at all true.
What intrigues me is that you seem to have knowledge about computers, as most people don't know what bloat software is. However, you assert that something is bloat when it's not. You exaggerate the issue and leave comments in a section where people are knowledgeable about the topic, making it likely that your comments will be ignored. I wonder why you do this. Is it just to feel justified, or do you genuinely believe you can convince others to agree with you?
The way people express their opinions is intriguing. When they like something, they tend to provide a detailed explanation for their preference, trying to convince others. But when they dislike something, they often start with a complaint, followed by personal criticism and then justify their negative opinion, even if it lacks substance such as calling this bloat when god knows that is not at all true.
What intrigues me is that you seem to have knowledge about computers, as most people don't know what bloat software is. However, you assert that something is bloat when it's not. You exaggerate the issue and leave comments in a section where people are knowledgeable about the topic, making it likely that your comments will be ignored. I wonder why you do this. Is it just to feel justified, or do you genuinely believe you can convince others to agree with you?